This is a blog I decided to start to share my walk as a School Board Member. My hope is to be as candid as possible.
Thursday, June 28, 2012
I am Sheila
I am Sheila. Let me explain why. When we (Sam, Diane, and I)were in Boston at the NSBA conference we all ended up at the same class at one point. This session focused on issues among board members. Given the state of our board we all apparently felt compelled to be there.
In the session the lecturer gave several scenarios that might cause board drama, and then we discussed handling that situation. One situation was with a board member named Sheila. SHeila stayed quiet in the meetings, never spoke up, but instead went home and blogged about it all. THe other board members were very upset with her blog and it caused friction on the board.
I have received a LOT of grief over this blog. I have been asked to take it down. I have been told I could have more say, if I didn't blog. However I find myself different from Sheila because I do speak my mind at meetings. I do share my thoughts and concerns. That got me nowhere, so I started blogging.
So in the class I raised my hand and asked, "What if Sheila also shares her thoughts in the meetings yet still chooses to blog at home?"
Needless to say there was a small uproar. This group felt that it was completely wrong to blog. I pushed back and asked why? We are elected public officials shouldn't we be encouraged to share everything that we can? And then someone in the room yells to me and says, "Oh my gosh, you're Sheila!"
I proudly turned and faced the entire room (I happened to be in the front row so the effect was great) and I shouted back "Yes I am, I am Sheila"
Needless to say at that moment I was happy to have Diane and Sam with me, because the crowd was a little scary.
After the session two people came up to me and told me they believed I was doing the right thing. One, was another younger women in her early thrities.
And the other was this guy -
He went against all my stereotypes that I had regarding the middle aged white man. He talked about how he too saw the fear of change. But he knows we have to go about things differently. We had a great discussion on the obstacles we face and the challenges ahead. ANd the courage to stand alone.
I hesitated sharing this story because I didn't want it to be used against me that this entire room thought blogging was wrong. THen I decided that it may not always be easy, and not everyone will agree, but I believe in what I am doing.
We just so happened to run into our friend later on at Cheers. He recognized the trio right away and of course me, Sheila.
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
The Mighty Gavel
On Monday the IPS School Board will be voting for our President, Vice-President, and Secretary. If you are new to the blog you can read what happened last year here:
http://annie-boardblog.blogspot.com/2011/07/broken-board.html
Not much has changed this year. We have not had one conversation as a group on this important decision. I think that is what bothers me the most. This board has a hard time of getting together and discussing these kind of things.
I still want to hopt that there can be changes, that someone new can be given the opportunity to lead. But in reality I don't see it happening.
I will keep everyone posted on how it all turns out.These seats will hold until the first of January when we vote again, and then we will continue the change in January.
Monday, June 25, 2012
Food Services Tour
A few months ago a group of moms started talking about the IPS lunches. They had some questions regarding the food itself, but also the way the lunch is served and the conditions of the lunch room.
On June 21st a few of us met at the IPS Food Services Center for a tour.
Here we all are. Pictures are parents from CFI 2, 84, and 27 and Jane Cookson, Director of Foodservice.
We all met at 8:30 am. The food service center was easy enough to find, but not as easy to get in to. One mom referred to it as Fort Knox. A few of us downed our remaining coffee in the parking lot before heading in. Again, we had to be buzzed in.
We were greeted right away by Jane and Steven Gudorf, Foodservice Project Manager.
The tour started with a powerpoint giving loads of information on how foodservices is managed. Because IPS receives the Federal Funds for 90% of the meals, IPS is held by very strict guidelines by the USDA. They gave us information calorie count by grad level, fruit and vegetable components, cost factors, ordering procedures,meat and grain components, and much more. Enough guidelines and restriction to give you a headache.
I think the group was pleasantly surprised at the health quality of the food. The whole grains, fresh fruits and vegetables, low fat dressings, NO FRIED FOODS!
One concern that did come up was the SPORK.
It is almost impossible to eat crisp lettuce in a salad with a spork. However to replace the spork with a fork / spoon combo it costs and additional 3 cents. Let's do the math. Roughly 26,000 eat lunch a day (not including breakfast). That's $780.00 a day. Times 180 days of school = $140,400 a year. Jane said she would rather that money be put into the food that is eaten. And I agree with her, but the spork is simply awful.
Next on the tour was a chilly walk through food services. Being summer the center is preparing about 3,000 lunches. If you don't know IPS has certain school all over the district that prepare breakfast and lunch at no cost to anyone under the age of 18. THis is still funded by the federal government, but controlled by IPS.
To take the tour we had to pull back our hair in a net and wear the gowns. We then walked through some foam spray that cleaned our shoes, and maybe a little of our pants.
I wish I would have thought to take pictures once we were back there. It was very clean, efficient, organized, and cold. THe entire area is kept around 40 degrees. Except the freezer which is 12 below. We didn't stay there too long at all.
On the menu that day was chicken salad and fresh strawberries. These strawberries looked beautiful.
All in all it was a great tour. THere are still concerns and improvements to be made, but a lot of these are at the school level. One main concern being the amount of time children have to eat. How they are treated while they are eating, and the limitations of talking. I still stand my ground on the milk.
Jane and Steve did an amazing job with the tour. THey answered all our questions and were extremely knowledgeable. I really appreciate the fact that they took timeout of their day to do this for us. As a board ember, I am glad I have this knowledge. As a mom I am happy to be apart of this group. THank you to al who showed up and Julie who organized.
Saturday, June 16, 2012
Retreating on the retreat
Right now the IPS school board is having a retreat. I am sitting at home. Why?
I did go down to the Ed Center, a few minutes early to make copies of something I was presenting today. My husband was covering the home front and all the kiddo schedules. Last retreat we "tried" to talk about the difficulties those of us with kids at home have making it to an all day Saturday retreat. One of us was always coming late or leaving early or leaving in the middle and coming back. But somehow we just ended up shifting the time of the Saturdays, which really didn't help any of us. Apparent because I was the only one of the three of us there.
I mentioned that we recently held an Executive session on the board evaluation of the Superintendent. A few days ago I called the Board secretary to ask the outcome of the tallies. I was instructed to contact the board president. So I did. She told me that information would be in our Friday packets. I was frustrated that I had to wait but accepted it. Yesterday I received an email saying there would be no Friday Packet delivery, we would get our packets at the retreat.
Today, my packet held no information on the Evaluation. I asked the President, she said I will get it on Monday.
Our Board President seems to have more power than the bylaws state. That position should not be privy to information the other members do not have.
As I sat there waiting for the meeting to begin, I became more and more upset. I am so tired (really, mentally exhausted) of being treated like I don't matter and that it is ok for information to be kept from me. I thought about my kids at home and my husband, and all the running around they will have to do today. I thought about all the moments in their life I have given up to put the board first, only to be outcasted from decision making.
So I left.
I am not proud of it, and I regret that I will miss out on valuable information. However, my heart could not take the treatment for another minute.
I did go down to the Ed Center, a few minutes early to make copies of something I was presenting today. My husband was covering the home front and all the kiddo schedules. Last retreat we "tried" to talk about the difficulties those of us with kids at home have making it to an all day Saturday retreat. One of us was always coming late or leaving early or leaving in the middle and coming back. But somehow we just ended up shifting the time of the Saturdays, which really didn't help any of us. Apparent because I was the only one of the three of us there.
I mentioned that we recently held an Executive session on the board evaluation of the Superintendent. A few days ago I called the Board secretary to ask the outcome of the tallies. I was instructed to contact the board president. So I did. She told me that information would be in our Friday packets. I was frustrated that I had to wait but accepted it. Yesterday I received an email saying there would be no Friday Packet delivery, we would get our packets at the retreat.
Today, my packet held no information on the Evaluation. I asked the President, she said I will get it on Monday.
Our Board President seems to have more power than the bylaws state. That position should not be privy to information the other members do not have.
As I sat there waiting for the meeting to begin, I became more and more upset. I am so tired (really, mentally exhausted) of being treated like I don't matter and that it is ok for information to be kept from me. I thought about my kids at home and my husband, and all the running around they will have to do today. I thought about all the moments in their life I have given up to put the board first, only to be outcasted from decision making.
So I left.
I am not proud of it, and I regret that I will miss out on valuable information. However, my heart could not take the treatment for another minute.
Wednesday, June 13, 2012
Got Milk?
One thing you many not know about me is my interest in good, healthy foods. After watching a few documentaries on food (Food Inc., King Corn) my outlook on what we eat has changed. it is not where it should be or where I desire it to be, but it is changing.
We no longer buy meat from our regular supermarket. Instead we buy from local farmers. We can do this through local Farmer's Markets, Green Bean delivery, or Pogues Run grocery. We do this to ensure our meat is not full of corn, hormones, and to ensure humane treatment of animals.
Since becoming a board member I have felt like a hypocrite when it comes to school lunch. I pack lunch for my children. If they forget, I usually drive to school so they don't have to eat school lunch.
*This is no way an insult to our food service department.
I just want my kids to have fresh fruits, veggies, and meat with a trail I can follow.
One thing that is very important to me is sugar intake. My kids have their share of sweets. Mostly because I want my share (and yours) of sweets. But my kids also have a lot of exercise and none are overweight. I have proposed on a few occasions to the school board to reduce the flavored milk options. This has been met with mixed feelings. Last month we brought in a pediatrician who serves many IPS students. Below I will share the minutes from that meeting. IPS also presented information from the food service department.
Dr. Johnson introduced William J. Fisher, MD and Brooke Barada, PNP who gave a presentation on Childhood Obesity and how it relates to Public Schools.
Ms. Barada gave the current obesity statistics:
Childhood obesity has tripled in the last 30 years
34% of American children are obese
60% are overweight
Overweight children cost 14.1 billion dollars yearly in
healthcare expenditures
Risks of Adult Obesity:
14% chance if obese as infant
25% chance if obese in preschool age
41% chance if obese at age 7
75% chance if obese at age 12
90% chance if obese as teenager
(Citations for these statics can be found in Pediatrics in Review,
Obesity Prevention and Treatment, volume 32, number 9,
September 2011)
Dr. Fischer explained;
The reasons for choosing milk:
Studies show that substituting for sugary drinks leads to weigh
loss and does not result in compensating for lost sugar calories
with other foods
It is everywhere – kids drink 16-24 ounces of milk per day
Studies show consuming sweetened drinks results in the desire
to consume more sugar
Statistics on IPS chocolate milk vs. skim milk:
IPS chocolate milk = 160 calories
Skim milk = 80 (some 90)
If a child makes one switch a day that saves them 80 calories x 5
Days = 400 calories a week, x 4 weeks = 1600 calories a month
3500 calories make a pound of weight loss
In 9 weeks kids could either gain a pound of sugar weight or not
Bottom line – we can easily spare kids four pounds of sugar weight
Gain per year with one simple change (not including breakfast issues)
The Body Mass Index:
BMI is a math equation involving height to weight ratios plotted against
an individual’s sex and age
BMI is used to predict future health problems, the higher the number the
more likely you are to have diabetes, heart disease, etc.
Pediatric BMI charts for children are from the Centers for Disease Control
and the World Health Organization
BMI of > 85% is overweight, > 9a5% is obese
Why Do We Want to Lower BMI:
10% decrease lowers blood pressure by 10
HDL (good cholesterol) increases by 10%
Triglycerides lower to goal of less than 100
What Medical Problems do Obese Children get to Look Forward to:
3 x more hypertension
3 x more diabetes
Early coronary artery disease
2 x more cholesterol problems
Sleep apnea
Worsening of their asthma
Depression, low self-esteem
Shortened life spans
Dr. Fischer said he has heard “if we don’t offer flavored milk the kids will not drink milk!” He said kids cannot make health choices for themselves, a six year old offered chocolate will take it. He said our jobs as adults, with the privilege of safe guarding kids, is to protect them and keep them healthy. He said if kids are offered only skim milk or water, almost all kids will pick skim milk after a few weeks.
Dr. Fischer said now is the time for change because obesity and diabetes have overtaken smoking as leading risk for death in the US and Indiana ranks 46/50 of most obese state in the US. He said this is an opportunity to be in front of an inevitable wave of change, and an opportunity for IPS to have good press which is something that is not always easy to come by.
Commissioner Arnold asked if the calcium amount is the same in skim milk as it is in vitamin D. Dr. Fischer said it is the same.
Commissioner Roof asked Dr. Fischer how many of his patients are IPS students and how many of them are over weight are. Dr. Fischer said that 30% of his patients are IPS students and 60-70% of them are over weight.
The Board and Dr. White thanked Dr. Fischer and his assistant Ms. Barada for their presentation.
Ms. Jane Cookson, IPS Foodservice Director, and Mr. Steve Gudorf gave an overview of Foodservice requirements;
The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010: Breakfast and Lunch Requirements
for the NSLP and SBP:
Consistent with the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans
Establish minimum/maximum calorie levels by grade range
Require a reduction in sodium over the next 10 years
Require <10% of total calories be from saturated fat Mandate zero grams trans fat per serving Caloric and Sodium Requirements: Caloric Ranges K-5 Breakfast 350-500 Lunch 550-650 6-8 Breakfast 400-550 Lunch 600-700 9-12 Breakfast 450-600 Lunch 750-850 Sodium Requirements Incremental Decreases School Year 2014-15 School Year 2017-18 School Year 2022-23 Implementation Deadlines: Lunch – July 1, 2012 Breakfast – July 1, 2013 Meat/Meat Alternate Component: Current K-12 1.5-2 oz daily minimum New K-5 1 oz. daily and 8-10 ounces weekly 6-8 1 oz. daily and 9-10 ounces weekly 9-12 2 oz daily and 10-12 ounces weekly Grain Component: Current Whole grains encouraged but no requirements for whole grains K-12 Minimum of 1 oz. serving daily and 8 servings weekly. No maximum Number of servings New July 2012 – 50% must be whole grain July 2013 – 100% must be whole grain K-5 1 oz. daily and 8-10 oz. weekly 6-8 1 oz daily and 9-10 oz. weekly 9-12 1 oz. daily and 10-12 oz. weekly Milk Component Current 8 oz offered daily Must offer more than one level of fat content. New 8 oz offered daily All flavored milk must be fat free. Only fat free and 1% low fat milk allowed. New K-5 ½ cup fruit & ¾ cup veg per day 6-8 ½ cup fruit & ¾ cup veg per day 9-12 1 cup fruit & 1 cup veg per day IPS will offer ½ cup servings of fruits and vegetables Fruit and Vegetable Components Current A total of ¾ cup of fruits & vegetables per day. IPS currently offering two 3/8 cup servings Fruits Canned packed in light syrup or juice Frozen without added sugar Fresh Fruit juice must be 100% strength No more than half of the fruit or vegetable offerings may be in the form of juice Vegetables Weekly requirements for Dark green (broccoli, romaine, spinach) Red/orange (tomatoes, carrots, sweet potatoes) Starchy (potatoes, corn, peas) Beans/Legumes (baked beans, black beans) Other (cucumbers, green beans, iceberg lettuce, etc) Offer vs. Serve Provision - Lunch Allows students to decline food they do not intend to eat. Current Must select three components May select four or five components New Must select three components; one must be a fruit or vegetable
K-12
May select four or five components
K-8
May select 2 vegetable servings
9-12
May select 2 vegetable and 2 fruit servings
Additional HHFKA Provisions
State Agency compliance monitoring will be conducted every 3 years
Water must be available for any student requesting it (effective July 2011)
An additional $ .06 will be added to the lunch reimbursement after all regulations are implemented and verified by the state agency
Paid meal equity guidance
Indirect cost guidance
Breakfast
Effective July 2013
Must offer ½ cup canned or fresh fruit or vegetable in addition to 4 oz. juice.
Students may select both.
Meat/meat alternate can only be served after the minimum daily requirement of grain is met.
2011-12 Reimbursement Rates
Breakfast
Paid $ .27
Reduced $1.50
Free $1.80
Lunch
Paid $ .28
Reduced $2.39
Free $2.79
Commodity Entitlement $.2225/lunch
Mr. Gudorf, IPS Foodservice Project Manager, shared the following information about the IPS Foodservice Department:
IPS Foodservice Department Mission Statement
To provide students with nutritious meals they will enjoy and at the lowest possible cost to students, parents, and taxpayers.
Centralized, enterprise organization
Self supporting since 1984
18 million dollar operating budget
43% Labor
40% Food
12% Operating Expenses
5% Equipment and Repairs
(Includes bond program expenses)
231 employees when fully staffed
96% of revenue comes from government reimbursement
USDA Programs Administered by IPS
National School Lunch Program
63 sites serve 4,656,000 lunches annually
School Breakfast Program
63 sites serve 2,700,000 breakfasts annually
After School Snack Program
36 schools serve 200,000 annually
Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program
24 schools serve 2,160,000 annually
Summer Food Service Program
various locations during summer school & intersessions
Additional Services Provided for Students
51 of 63 schools serve all students breakfast and lunch at no charge
13,100 Meal/Textbook assistance applications are processed which provides additional dollars through E-rate, Title 1, and grants (April 2012, 88% of students qualify for free or reduced meals)
50,000 box lunches are packed annually
Modified meals prepared and served to 80 students with medical restrictions
IPS History of Nutritional Integrity
1985-1990 - 1% milk, eliminated a la carte snack foods, moved from canned to frozen vegetables
1990-1995 – Offered entrĂ©e salads, moved to light syrup canned fruits
1995-2000 – Eliminated fried foods, moved to reduced or non-fat dressings
2005-2010 – Moved to turkey based products, served more protein at breakfast, increased the variety of fresh fruits and vegetables
2010-current – Increased whole grain bread offerings, moved to reduced sodium and low fat cheeses, served skim flavored milk, spec’d zero gram trans fat foods
Commissioner Arnold asked if fat-free milk has sugar in it. Ms. Cookson said it is free of fat, but it does contain sugar. Commissioner Arnold asked what the cost is for full paying students for breakfast and lunch. Ms. Cookson said that breakfast is $1.00 for all grade levels, and that lunch is $1.40 for elementary, $1.65 for middle school, and $1.80 for high school. Commissioner Arnold asked if there are very many children with lactose intolerance to milk in IPS. Ms. Cookson said there are some and they are given fruit juice in place of milk.
Commissioner Roof asked what percentages of students eat breakfast and lunch. Mr. Gudorf said as of March for elementary 69% ate breakfast and 94% ate lunch; middle school 46% ate breakfast and 76% ate lunch; and high school 30% ate breakfast and 82% ate lunch. Commissioner Roof expressed concern that students are only given 20 minutes for lunch and sometimes throw away there oranges because they do not have time to peel them. She said she hopes that IPS will look into the amount of time students are given for lunch and take that into consideration. Commissioner Roof asked if a pizza is considered a grain. Ms. Cookson said the crust of a pizza is considered a grain. Commissioner Roof said that the strawberry milk that is served in IPS does not have any strawberry in it and has red dye #40 in it which directly affects the behavior of students with ADHD, ADD, and autism. She said this is a great concern for her and other parents. Commissioner Roof asked if Foodservice sees any road blocks for serving only white milk. Ms. Cookson said some districts have tried it and been successful and some have not.
Commissioner Arnold asked if the flavored milks are more expensive than the white milk. Ms. Cookson said there is about a penny difference in cost. Commissioner Arnold asked how much a year IPS would save if they only bought white milk. Ms. Cookson said she would get that figure for the Board.
Commissioner Roof said she feels IPS has nothing to lose by going to just white skim milk.
Commissioner Arnold asked if IPS could just try a pilot program of just using white skim milk. Dr. White said it would not be the whole district doing the pilot, just a few schools. Commissioner Arnold asked why not the whole district. Dr. White said the results of just a few schools would be all that was needed to make the decision of whether or not to change the whole district. He said it would really depend on the Foodservice Department of what kind of pilot program they can put together.
Consensus of the Board was to direct the Superintendent to investigate a possible pilot program along with the pros and cons. He said he will bring back the results of his investigation to the Board at the retreat.
Commissioner Arnold asked what the caloric difference is between flavored milk and non-flavored. Ms. Cookson said the flavored milk is 50 calories higher.
Non-blogger
I have several blogs that I like to frequent. I get irritated when they aren't updated so I am sorry that I haven't been posting lately. I need to set a rule for myself to post every three days no matter what.
Personally, I have been extremely busy. Three kids in three schools proved to be more than I could handle. And EVERYTHING seems to be scheduled for the end of the year. Teas, choir performances, projects, field days, graduations, award ceremonies, orchestra concert, and on and on. Now it is the first day of summer, and I can breathe...a little.
The board hit a busy spot as well. You may or may not be aware of the situation at Tech. That proved to be a busy time for emails, phone calls, meetings and more. For different reasons I will not discuss those happenings. 1) We are still in investigation. 2) This is a child.
We have also held meetings to discuss a lawsuit against the state for funding issues. Recently we held an Executive session so board members could submit their Superintendent Evaluation. This Saturday we will meet in an all day Retreat, from 1-8pm. And last night we were all at a graduation ceremony. I attended Manual.
There are specific topics that were important to me, and I will blog about those separately.
The board relationship is no better than it has been in the past. It's candidate time and I have heard form several people who have stated they will run for school board. I am trying to be more sensitive about this issue. I would love to start the year off with a "new" board. I want to canvass, and support, and back certain candidates. But I have really struggled with the concern of what damage that may do. If someone wins the seat that I didn't support (current members or someone new) I am afraid that will cause even more tension on the board. This board dynamic is so damaged it can not handle much more. At the end of the day, the board can do more if there was mutual respect among board members. I sincerely question if this could ever be repaired among the current board, but I certainly don't want to make it worse.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)